The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on unlawful sports betting.
No, they weren't personally in presence, however the world-famous celebrities were notably included in a slide presentation on social and sweepstakes casinos - the controversial sites using both free casino-style video games and rewarding prizes, such as cash, gift cards or cryptocurrency. In one advertisement, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can 'bet complimentary,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.
The sites are simply two cogs in the multibillion-dollar industry that now finds itself besieged by suits. In the eyes of numerous video gaming corporations, not to point out claim complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos act as standard gambling establishments, only without the oversight, consumer protections and tax laws. So not just can they avoid the steep 24-percent federal gaming levy, but sweepstakes operators aren't based on regulatory hurdles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming protections.
One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in income in 2015 alone. Now the company deals with accusations of unlawful gaming in a New York lawsuit that claims VGW utilizes celeb endorsers to 'produce a veneer of legitimacy' around its item. (See VGW's statement below)
'I'm not exactly sure" if you don't trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton" is a winning message for business running multibillion-dollar unlawful operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's speaker, Howard Glaser of video gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.
Sweepstakes endorsers include a variety of celebrities from gambling enthusiasts Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, as well as NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom offer any differences between conventional sports betting and sweepstakes play.
Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among many sweepstakes gambling establishments discovered online
Ryan Seacrest prompts fans to play at Chumba Casino, where many - but not all - video games are free
Drake has a handle social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he routinely touts on social networks
Learn more
Donald Trump 'set to call NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy'
Instead, advertisements typically center around the social element of the gambling establishments, while leaving out the potential for real sports betting losses.
Others lure consumers with guarantees of rewards. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks advertisement flaunting Drake's cars and trucks, airplanes and estates before pivoting to video of the rapper playing online casino-style video games.
'Daddy, why do we have so much money?' read the very first caption on the screen.
Another caption discussed: 'Because I never ever gave up.'
The inconsistency in between gaming websites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit complicated, but operators of the latter insist they're not involved with the previous.
A spokesperson for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), discussed its members are not in direct competitors with online casinos and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, many of the players on social-sweepstakes gambling establishments are sports betting free.
'Most social sweeps customers never ever make a purchase,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of who make purchases do so in amounts far smaller than the normal deposit or bet size at real-money online gaming websites.'
Social gambling establishments provide consumers an opportunity to play casino-style video games with friends. Players have the choice to buy valueless currency typically referred to as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged genuine cash, but can be utilized to open various functions within the video games.
But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes gaming, allowing customers to acquire other currency called 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for money or other prizes.
And therein lies the capacity for monetary losses, like the ones claimed by plaintiffs in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One player told the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes casinos in the past year after continuing to buy more coins in pursuit of money and other things of worth.
bet9ja.com
The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting an International Poker occasion
bet9ja.com
Social sweeps casino Stake ran an ad showing off Drake's cars, planes and estates
Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker
Traditional online casinos are banned in all however seven states, which has helped to fuel the popularity of sweepstakes casinos.
Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which do not require usually require identification. However, sites like Chumba will ask for IDs from gamers trying to withdraw any funds.
Many websites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, enable customers to submit mail-in requests for complimentary sweeps coins, offered the players follow painfully specific guidelines. What's more, gamers are frequently rewarded with sweeps coins merely for signing up, therefore providing a factor to try their hands at any number of gambling establishment games for a possibility to win - or lose - real money.
So why are sweepstakes websites allowed to operate in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are prohibited in all but 7?
According to the stakeholders, their item is the complimentary casino-style gaming, and the real-stakes competition is just a means of promoting their support.
'Social sweepstakes games are simply a form of online home entertainment,' an SPGA representative told DailyMail.com by e-mail. 'No purchase is needed to play at social gambling establishments with sweepstakes rewards. Consumers never need to spend for a chance to win rewards. That lack of a purchase requirement - or" factor to consider" - is a crucial distinction in between social sweeps and conventional online sports betting sites like casinos.'
Think of the method that McDonald's uses its yearly Monopoly game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to bet, but rather they're buying hamburgers and french fries that use them the possibility to win financially rewarding prizes, such as a $1 million prize.
And without a purchase requirement, or 'factor to consider', the game itself does not meet the meaning of sports betting in the US.
'Sweepstakes are a long-standing approach for promoting all sort of everyday organizations in the United States, everything from burgers to magazine memberships to coffee and home enhancement shops,' the SPGA representative told DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promos are routinely used by a who's who of home names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'
But to lots of gambling market experts, that argument doesn't cut it.
For beginners, gaming attorney Daniel Wallach points out, McDonald's Monopoly game does not run forever. Rather, it has a well-defined start and end, consequently suggesting the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's main item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being utilized to promote genuine items like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.
'They do not last forever and they're typically not tied to casino-style games of chance,' Wallach told DailyMail.com. 'They're just cash free gifts.
'The sweepstakes [casinos] possess none of the characteristics frequently associated with McDonald's-design sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in eternity, the sweepstakes casinos offer" casino-like" payouts, usually 80 percent or more of revenues, whereas the common payment percentage for a momentary advertising sweepstakes is an unimportant share of the earnings made by the company [generally less than one percent]'
Wallach fasts to liken the online social sweeps casinos to the internet cafes that sprang up in Florida, offering customers the opportunity to play casino-style video games for real prizes. Much of those brick-and-mortar establishments have actually since been shuttered over accusations of unlawful gambling.
DJ Khaled is amongst several celebrity spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand name
Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments need to face comparable analysis.
'These distinctions are not approximate,' Wallach said of social sweeps casinos. 'They have repeatedly been cited by courts and state chief law officer as key consider determining that a sweepstakes promotion was in fact a guise for prohibited gaming.'
Among the casino market's leading trade organizations, the American Gaming Association, is now pushing lawmakers to examine sweepstakes operators and, in many cases, enact new legislation on the problem.
'Consumers are being denied of protections and states are forgoing significant tax and income chances as this gaming changes that conducted through controlled channels,' read a well-circulated AGA memo.
And after that there are the plaintiffs who have actually sued social casinos in more than a dozen states.
Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in 4 separate cases in Kentucky without confessing any misbehavior, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW agreed to pay $11.75 million in one class-action suit, stating the settlement was made to prevent legal expenses and continued lawsuits.
Michael Phelps has actually signed a handle the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker
In the current claim, which is mainly comparable to its predecessors, New york city state citizens Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an 'unlawful gambling business. '
Apple and Google have actually likewise been called as offenders in claims for hosting the sweepstakes sites. But unlike VGW, neither tech company reacted to DailyMail.com's request for remark.
'We typically do not comment on matters before the courts,' a VGW spokesperson informed DailyMail.com through e-mail. 'However, we note that this claim has actually only simply been submitted with the court and VGW has not been formally served.
'We have full confidence in our compliance with all laws and regulations where we operate, and stay positive about the future,' the representative continued. 'We continue to offer our free-to-play games throughout the majority of North America, as we have for more than a decade, creating not just terrific video games, user experiences and entertainment, however also ensuring this is done securely, properly and at the highest level of standards.
'More broadly, we 'd restate that class actions and other lawsuits and arbitrations are relatively common throughout the online social video games industry (and the US more broadly), and our standard practice is that we mean to strongly safeguard any claim which may be brought versus us.'
The issues in between conventional online gambling and sweepstakes casinos might show bothersome for some celebrity endorsers.
bet9ja.com
Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both endorse VGW's Global Poker brand name while the NBA is partnered with conventional gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.
'It's ironic that expert athletes are hawking unlawful sports betting 'sweeps' sites while at the same time the leagues wish to predict a strong stance versus unlawful sports betting - especially when attempting to tamp down the periodic gambling scandal,' Glaser informed DailyMail.com.
It was simply eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a lifetime ban from the NBA over claims he conspired with bettors. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unassociated to anything involving social or sweepstakes casinos.
Together with VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting apparently illegal sports betting websites
Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a major concern for leagues such as the NBA.
'I 'd anticipate that a league crackdown on professional athletes backing sweepstakes websites refers when, not if,' Glaser added.
Neither an NBA spokesperson nor the players' agents reacted to DailyMail.com's demands for comment. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise overlooked to respond to DailyMail.com e-mails.
Asked if their celeb endorsers have a responsibility to explain to customers the distinctions and similarities in between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW firmly insisted there is absolutely nothing more that needs to be done.
'We have full self-confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial collaborations, and our business practices more broadly,' the representative said. 'A few of our worths are" our players come initially" and" we do what's right", and we put our values at the core of everything we do.'
Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes websites, sees things in a different way.
'Celebrities who lend their names to dubious prohibited sports betting websites are, at a minimum, putting their track records at risk along with courting civil and class actions by customers who declare harm,' Glaser stated. 'There is also some threat that state regulators and state chief law officers rope celebrity endorsers into enforcement efforts for assisting in unlawful gaming.'
New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton
1
Sweepstakes Casino Controversy - And Celebrities' All-important Role
karastark37503 edited this page 2024-12-31 14:48:31 +08:00